Dispute Over NCAA’s Athlete Compensation Rules Headed to the Supreme Court

What’s the difference between college and professional sports?  Zeros.  Lots of them.  And actually, we’re talking about millions of dollars and the idea that student-athletes don’t see any of it.  It’s gone to court and there have been appeals and NOW it’s going to the BIG court in Washington DC.

The Supreme Court on Wednesday agreed to hear a dispute over whether the National Collegiate Athletic Association’s (NCAA) rules on student-athlete compensation violate antitrust law, a potentially landmark case that could reshape collegiate sports.

The court will consider the NCAA’s appeal from lower court rulings that found the association’s limits on non-cash benefits for education-related expenses like computers, study-abroad programs and graduate school tuition were invalid.

In its request for appeal, the NCAA told the justices that if the rulings below were allowed to stand, it would “fundamentally transform” the nature of college athletics by “blurring the traditional line between college and professional athletes.”

The dispute arose in 2014 when a group of current and former college athletes sued the NCAA in federal district court in California over its restrictions on player compensation. The players maintain that the NCAA’s rules run afoul of antitrust provisions that make it illegal for competitors — in this case, colleges — to restrain competition for talent and labor.

“The NCAA and its member conferences and schools receive billions of dollars every year through the hard work, sweat, and sometimes broken bodies of student-athletes,” they wrote in a Supreme Court filing. “Coaches, assistant coaches, and athletic directors take millions in salaries.
“Yet the schools have agreed among themselves to limit what student-athletes may receive for their work in generating these extraordinary revenues,” the student-athletes’ brief continued. In a March 2019 ruling siding with the college-athletes, U.S. District Court Judge Claudia Wilken found that NCAA’s limits on “computers, science equipment, musical instruments, and other tangible items […] related to the pursuit of academic studies” were unlawful. The justices will hear arguments in the case likely this spring, with a decision expected before the term ends in late June so not really in time for March Madness this year.

But disputes like this one are EVERYWHERE.  And when those nasty things show up on your front door and affect YOU and YOUR business including landlord/tenant matters, contract issues, nuisance ADA claims and even collections, call in the good guy business litigator Dean Sperling to resolve YOUR matter with YOUR best interests mind!
More on the case: